NFCC chair Roy Wilsher has stated, “It’s imperative we find out why a non-compliant, extremely dangerous cladding system was on Grenfell Tower, along with hundreds of other buildings across the country. The bereaved survivors and families deserve answers and I truly hope they find the answers they need from Phase 2.”
The first phase of the Grenfell Tower Inquiry found the cladding system was the “principal” reason for the rapid and “profoundly shocking” spread of the fire. The second phase concentrates on how – and why – the building was clad in a flammable material during its refurbishment.
Back in February, the NFCC expressed shock following the opening evidence given to the second phase of the Grenfell Inquiry, including e-mails which suggested companies knew the components of the cladding system would fail in the event of a fire. At the time, the NFCC stated, “The evidence undoubtedly showed a clear lack of concern for fire safety and a blatant disregard for people. It made it clear manufacturers and distributors were fully aware of the flammability of the cladding. This disregard for safety undoubtedly contributed to the loss of life at Grenfell Tower.”
Roy Wilsher continued, “The evidence presented was so shocking I’m not sure how anyone, including the London Fire Brigade, could have possibly known the building was wrapped in such a cladding system that so clearly breached Building Regulations. Firefighters faced an impossible situation when confronted with the enormity of the fire, with no prior knowledge of the materials used in the refurbishment. The extraordinary work of firefighters on the night must be commended. As highlighted by expert witnesses in Phase 1, it was not reasonable the Brigade should be expected to fully mitigate a fire arising from the installation of these materials, particularly so where the Brigade had never been informed that a combustible system had been installed in the first place.”
Evidence presented so far at the Grenfell Tower Inquiry includes the following:
- Decisions taken to use ACM cladding to make savings in the region of £450,000
- Fire engineers being excluded from communications about the details of the cladding
- An internal e-mail from the insulation manufacturer where an executive admitted to a distributor it was “clearly wrong” to think it was OK to use combustible insulation on buildings of any height
- e-mails show that distributors of the cladding stating they would only use non-combustible cladding if “specifically challenged”
- In April 2016, while works on Grenfell Tower were ongoing, cladding manufacturer Arconic was sent guidance stating that UK Building Regulations required “all significant elements of each and every layer of the wall to be non-combustible or of limited combustibility”
Assurity Consulting are leading experts in workplace health, safety and environmental compliance. Our team of fire safety experts are qualified to help our customers in making their buildings as safe as possible. For more information on our services, and how we can help you, please contact us on tel. +44 (0)1403 269375 or email us.